Posts Tagged ‘eFlow’

Reverie Roused.

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

I awoke this morning to a pleasant surprise a chap called Jesse who often posts insightful comments on to my blog, came up with a good point. See my blog comments on yesterday’s Admitting Defeat. I immediately dashed off a letter to Pierse & Fitzgibbon, which I give below:-

Dear Sirs,

I acknowledge your rather shrewish letter of 17 February 2010 and note by your tone that you realised mankind had left this planet several years ago and that you now only write and speak to the inanimate.

Perhaps a little advice would do no harm here and it might help in your dealings with the lumps of stone that are scattered around.  Erratics we call them in Archaeology.

A friend of mine with experience in this field that we are mired in, wonders why this car reg. could not have been matched up sooner with my payment.

He goes on to say “Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, we do not have more than five numerics in our reg. nos. They imply you imputted six.  Who did the systems analysis work here?  My point is, the fact that your payment was accepted on the net would seem to indicate that your reg. no. was validated.  It would be intetresting to see, if, in fact, you did key in the right data.”

Perhaps you might put it to eFlow that their system is flawed and needs replacing and also this piece of advice must be worth money, so how about paying my costs.

Yours Faithfully,

Paul Malpas.

We will see if anything will happen but I am definately going to send the file to the Ombudsman.  When I hear something, so will you.

To change tack, I have, for the last few days, been researching the life of a British soldier who served in the Army in the middle of the 19th century in India.  He was born in Ballygar in Galway in 1828 and made it through the Famine.  In 1847 aged 19 he enlisted in Warrington and joined the 29th Foot (Worcester regiment) and spent 12 years with them serving through the 2nd Sikh War in the Punjab and the Indian Mutiny in 1857-8.  Volunteered to join the 80th Foot when his first regiment went home and served eight years with them, serving all over central India and in the North East in Assam and Bhutan in the Himalayas and when they went home joined the 88th Foot (Connaught Rangers). where he spent his last two years in service, taking part in the Grand Durbar of 1866 at Agra before walking 500 miles to Rawalpindi to build a road. It was at Rawalpindi, which is at the other end of the Khyber Pass from Kabul that he developed presbyopia, which stops the eyes from focussing at near sight and he was discharged unfit for duty.  He was probably the fittest 40 year old around after all his endeavours.  He came home, married a girl from Williamstown, had five children and died at 51 years old and he his buried in Glenamaddy graveyard.  He packed a lot in and saw a lot more of the world than most in those pre-Ryanair days.  In all his 21 years in the Army he never rose beyond a private and never received a pension but he would have been a great man to sit and have a pint of Guiness with.

Another thought that struck me was that the British Army have not moved far in 143 years.  They are only 200 miles away now in Helmand Province in Afghanistan.

So here’s to you Bernard Lohan, may you forever rest in peace and may your god go with you

  • Share/Bookmark

Barrier Free.

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Victory at last, if victory is what it is.  After three and a half months jousting with bullies and sweating under their threats of imprisonment and large fines, I today received a letter from Pierse & Fitzgibbon,  Solicitors, Market St. Listowel.  Verbatim it reads:-

National Roads Authority v PAUL MALPAS

M50 Barrier-free Tolling System

Re:    Our Client                                   National Roads Authority

Ref No:                                                      U11-0836-5756

Dear Sir,

We refer to the above and previous correspondence herein, in particular your letter to these offices.  We referred the matter to our client for investigation who confirmed that the difficulty arose due to an incorrect car registration number being identified i.e. the licence plate number the payment was made against was 012874RN instead of 01RN2874.

Therefore we confirm the above referenced matter has now been closed.

Yours faithfully.

Pierse & Fitzgibbon.

Regular readers will be aware from previous blogs that this appears to be the end of this saga, see Money For Old Rope posted on 1 February 2010, Old Monkey Face posted on 17 January 2010, Back On Track posted on 15 January 2010, No Posts Today posted on 13 January 2010, and Hoping And Praying posted on 13 December 2009.

After these three and a half months anyone with a lesser mental constitution would have been battered into submission.  Letter after letter, from first of all eFlow, then from Pierse & Fitzgibbon threatening imprisonment or a massive fine and a mention in Stubb’s Gazette would surely have tested the resolve of most and I really feel sorry for any more sensitive soul who as had to bear the brunt of this Government inspired brutality.

After hours of letter writing and blogging to receive the above letter with its dismissive and disrespectful tone is just plain ignorant and something you do not want from Government Agencies in a democratic country, especially when I paid my dues within days of incurring same, while the drinking chums of that same Government walk away with millions of euros on a daily basis.  It reminds me somewhat of the First World War.  We are just cannon fodder.

The letter should have been apologetic and I hope to get one and that is why the matter is not closed as far as I am concerned.  I am writing to Pierse and old monkey face today demanding an apology and/or the payment of my €350 costs for fighting my corner.  Bullies do not like to be faced up, so I am expecting them to go into a funk  and lie down.  I will keep you posted.

Below is my letter to them:_

Messrs Pierse & Fitzgibbon,                                                                                                                                           5 February 2010            Market St.                                                                                                                                                                                                            Listowel,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Co. Kerry.

National Roads Authority v PAULMALPAS                                                                                                                                                        M50 Barrier-free Tolling System

Re:    Your Client                                       National Roads Authority

Ref No:                                                  U11-0836-5756

Dear Sirs,

I refer to your letter of 2 February 2010 referring to the above and that the above referenced matter is now closed.  I unfortunately disagree, after many telephone calls, e-mails and letters setting out my defence on this matter, I am not happy to be parked up.  I want an apology from yourselves or your client or the payment of the €350 costs that I have been put to in this defence and as asked for in my recent letter to yourselves.

If I have heard nothing from you by 19 February 2010 I will send all the relevant papers to the Ombudsman who will advise me of my rights when faced with the bullying tactics of yourselves and eFlow in the future.

Yours Faithfully

Paul Malpas

  • Share/Bookmark

Back on Track.

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Fresh from my day out in Dublin, I come renewed to take up the cudgel of the common man and reverse its orbit so that it hopefully strikes where it hurts on the bloated,  bullying bodies of`the plutocratic governmental organizations.

As you probably read in two of my previous blogs Hoping and Praying of 13 December 2009 and No Posts Today of 13 January 2010, I have a beef with somebody or more like it, they have a beef with me.  I thought it was with that estimable company eFlow who collect tolls from motorists on the M50 motorway, but it seems that when their bullying does not produce results, they pass the can over to the Road Transport Authority (RTA) who are the real culprits in this matter. eFlow are not a bad old crowd, it just happens that having to withstand the goading and prodding of their masters, the RTA, they have turned into snarling feral beasts in order to maintain the various contracts they have with their lord and master.

Anyway, now the RTA have full control of the dispute and  I expect it to be scaled up to red alert status, they have set the dogs of war on my tail in the admirable form of Pierse & Fitzgibbon, Solicitors, of Main Street, Listowel, Co. Kerry.  No doubt because one of their founding fathers was the son of a monkey.  They of course bring to the table all the baggage Listowel justice personifies.  In one paragraph they threatened  with a Judgement against me in the High Court and worse, my name being published in that spanish inquisition of a newspaper, Stubbs Gazette.  I do not know what prompted them with this double whammy but I presume it is because I am innocent of all charges.  If they are nervous of getting the guilty verdict in the High Court, they have settled for a full broadside hoping something will stick.

So in fear of my life and worried about how this fracas was affecting my wife’s health, who is frail enough at the best of times, I wrote back to the affiliates of the sons of monkeys in a very placatory fashion.  In fact after the letter had been posted and having re-read the same to the Listowel Lambasters, I was regretful of its wheedling tone.  I produce it here to show you how the relentless, persistent and overbearing nature of government agencies can weaken even the strongest resolve.

Messrs Pierse & Fitzgibbon
Market Street
Listowel
Co. Kerry

Dear Sir/Madam,
Toll Violation Notice No. U11-0836-5756
My Licence Plate   01RN2874

Thank you for your kind missive of 12 January 2010 or should we refer to it as the TVN.  Can I say from the outset that I am innocent.  I paid my €3 on 20 October 2009.  I have a bank statement to prove it.

I note from your TVN that Messrs eFlow have washed their hands of this matter and passed the burden of their errors on to the National Roads Authority, who it seems are your clients.

Having decided to take this TVN extremely seriously as you suggest, I would like to list chronologically the events and papers that I will bring to the High Court on whatever date you suggest.  Copies of all the following will have been passed on to you by Messrs eFlow, so there will be no need for me to include them with this letter.
1.  eFlow UTN No 1 of 25 October 2009
2.  Record of my telephone call to eFlow call centre on 27 October 2009
3.  Copy of my e-mail through eFlow web message function on 27 October 2009.
4.  Bank of Ireland statement of 3 November 2009 listing €3 payment to eFlow.
5.  eFlow UTN No 2 of  3 November 2009
6.  My registered letter to eFlow of 12 November 2009.
7.  eFlow letter to me of 20 November 2009
8.  My letter to eFlow of 25 November 2009.
9.  eFlow letter to me of 1 December 2009 in which eFlow state that “We acknowledge that you made a payment”

Might I also bring to your attention my blogging vehicle www.paulmalpas.com and in particular two blogs.  The first published on 13 December 2009 and titled Hoping and Praying and the second published on 14 January 2010 and titled No Posts Today.  Could I also remind you that the original charge was for €3 which I paid immediately and this rigmarole which we both find ourselves on is a ridiculous and unnecessary procedure, which should be stopped forthwith.  Just as costs on your side must be building up to ridiculous proportions, mine also on your receipt of this letter will have amounted to €350.  Let us stop this nonsense and call it a day and go for eFlow who seem to have a litany of undeclared assets that they are not being passed on to our esteemed National Roads Authority, notably my €3.  If Mr Lenihan knew the reason he cannot balance his books is because of eFlow’s non-performance, he would definitely be on the warpath.  Please keep in mind the original €3.

Notwithstanding all of the above and I know that in this third world, totalitarian, police state in which we live, my pleas of innocence will go unheeded and the mantra of the Fianna Fail party of ” Bang the Buggers up” will prevail.   I ask you to make my journey through the penitential system as easy as possible.  I am a pensioner.   I have not worked for five years and my wife is of a similar age and situation, having worn herself out looking after our large family of six children for this last 37 years.  Castlerea would be my slammer of choice as it is suitably situated for all my friends in Boyle to visit.

In the meantime I look forward to my day in court with you, my faceless and nameless adversary.  Does it not fill your time with joy after all your years studying jurisprudence and tort, to be stuck behind some computer screen chasing shadows.  Get out now and get out quickly before you become a moron or am I too late.

Your obedient and hopefully loyal citizen,

Paul Malpas

P.s.  It was a nice try threatening me with Mr Stubbs’s rag, but he is a cousin of mine and he would never have a bad word said against me.

By the way and if it has not been said time and again, my original charge for going through the toll was €3 which I paid immediately.  It is now €152 and rising.  Is there any legal brain out there who can tell me, because of my innocence in this matter, how I can force on these people my costs, which run to €350 at the moment.  It does seem to me that unless I employ some bigwig whose fees and resultant costs will be extortionate, I cannot reclaim my costs for fighting this libellous slur on my good name.  The whole shebang adds full credence to Shakespeare’s line in Lear of  “madmen leading the blind”.

I will keep you informed as to my future progress in this ruction as I cannot be the only one eFlow, the RTA, Fianna Fail and Pierse & Fitzgibbon have lined up.  The harrowing detail of my crucifixion might just help someone in a moment of weakness when they are considering paying twice to drive between Blanchardstown and Collinstown

  • Share/Bookmark

Hoping and Praying

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Why is it that  all large organizations in the past few years who have set up an internet system for accepting people’s enquiries, payments etc always get it wrong in the beginning?  I know why.  It is because the people or companies they employ for setting up these systems are absolute geniuses, their websites cover all probabilities faced by the anxious customer.  Prices, payments, passwords, terms and conditions, data protection, privacy rules and in some of them you can do your business in a multiplicity of languages.  The only thing they forget about is the customer, the human being who has not just jumped out of the pages of George Orwell’s 1984, the human being with feelings, emotions and generally with an innate sense of fair play.  Why should they not forget?  They are web designers, anoraks, thrutches and worst of all third parties who do not inhabit this wholesome world of ours, but sit in front of screens and dream up systems.

The customer is the single most important piece in the business equation.  Without the customer there would be no business,  no employment and no need.  So what we get is high tech companies delivering high tech channels through which the unconsidered customers can send their hard earned monies to automatons.  What if something goes wrong? Well, we will set up a call centre and because the customer has not been considered, we will fill this call centre with non- empathising, unsympathetic, underpaid decendants of the Black and Tans and Auxillaries ” Saturday nights out”. They naturally have a bullying disposition and are able to spit down the phone.

Such a company is eFlow, an organization set up to manage the barrier-free collection of tolls on Irish Toll Roads which has been in operation since 30 August 2008.  Now nobody minds teething problems but when the baby is approaching majority and still suffering it is time for the alarm bells to ring.

I have been through this barrier free tolling system twice in the 16 months of its operation, so I cannot be called a frequent user or even an experienced traveller but on the 18 October 2009 coming back to Roscommon from Dublin Airport, I let myself in for the full force of this bullying, customer last philosoph,  of Ireland’s premier, barrier free tolling specialist.

It was around 5.00pm on a lovely October Sunday afternoon, after we had dropped off two of our daughters at the airport, having sampled the delights of the Shelbourne Hotel’s famous high tea.  We, my wife and I that is,were in a happy mood as we went through the said system and then diverted off onto the N4 for our two hour journey home.  So it must have been around 7.00pm when we drove onto our property and Helen, my wife of many years standing and not prone to lies, sat at the computer and through the eFlow barrier free toll website’s automatic collection system paid our €3 toll.

Imagine our surprise when, on 27 October 2009, we received a UTN from eFlow.  A UTN, to you untrammelled people of the Gobi Desert, is an Unpaid Toll Notice that eFlow send out like Dail deputies send out Christmas cards.  They informed me that because I had not paid my original €3 toll within seven days, I now had an additional charge of €3 , a total of €6 to be paid immediately.

I was alarmed and rang their lo-call number and was put through to a neanderthal Cork man, one of a team of simians working that day at eFlow barrier free tolling’s call centre.  I explained to him my plight and he grunted as only the neanderthal can, that the payment was not on the system therefore we had not paid.  Quod erat demonstrandum as they say in the maths class.  It is not the duty of eFlow to prove they had been paid but it is the duty of the customer to prove that he  has paid.  After a few more minutes lambast from the prehistoric rebel, I put down the telephone and shivered.  I decided on another approach and at 3.14pm that afternoon I availed of the email system displayed on the eFlow barrier free toll system website and explained what I had done.

Nothing until the 3 November 2009 when I received our monthly bank statement showing that €3 had been deducted from our account on 20 October 2009 and it had been credited to the eFlow barrier free toll account.  By that same post I received another UTN from eFlow barrier free toll telling me that because I had not paid the original €3 or the additional charge of €3,  I was now landed with a charge of €41.50 leaving me with a total charge of €47.50 and confirming that if I did not pay this within 56 days a TVN would be issued.  To you Gobis that is a Toll Violation Notice, demanding a further €104.50, making a total of €146 which if not paid would result in an immediate prosecution and either a fine of up to €5,000 or imprisonment for up to six months.

My blood was up and I wrote a registered letter to eFlow confirming eveything that had taken place and told them also that I charge my fees out at a very reasonable €150 per hour and would appreciate this sum of €150 for system consultancy work to be paid by return.  On 20 November 2009 I received a letter from eFlow Customer Services (I was wrong they obviously value their customers).  The letter informed me that they had checked their call centre and there was no record of my telephone call to prehistory, my ensuing email or my money on their system but the money could be possibly traced if I was to give them fresh details of my payment method, card number, expiry date of my laser card and names of bank account holder.  I was naturally and still am reluctant to divulge of this information to such a bullying, uncouth and disorganized company.  I thought of Bertie’s biscuit tin and wondered if my money might be there.  In this letter of the 20th they apologised like only eFlow Customer Services can and said “However due to the standard protocol to be followed in this circumstance this is the only method we can correctly follow in order to cancel all amounts due”

I wrote back to say that the original €3 had been massively overwhelmed by the threat of a six month jail sentence.  I felt like Ned Kelly and Jack Duggan rolled into one.  I also told them that my financial details were my own affair and their intimidating behaviour was the cause of my reticence and I also upped my fee  to €200 having not received any recompense from my original charge.

December dawned and with it another eFlow letter apologizing for their poor service so far and the fact that my correspondence had been forwarded to their IT department.  Perhaps this is a euphemism for their Accounts Department and perhaps I might receive my consultancy fees.  They went on to say that I had made a “genuine attempt to pay your toll on time and correctly” but that they could not close the notice and they requested the same financial details and went on then to say “We acknowledge that you made a payment” but the notice still stands.

Can anybody out there tell me:-

1)  Where is my money?

2)  Will I get my consultancy fees?

3)  What should I do now?

4)  What is life like in Mountjoy?

5)  Why is the world full of idiots and companies full of idiot systems held together with idiot protocols?

6)  Where is Scotty?

7)  If my original bill was €3 and my original fees were €150 does it mean that every employee of eFlow will get:-

€3      =      6 months

Therefore €150 = 300 months (or 25 years penal servitude).

Is it a little hard for writing idiot letters?

  • Share/Bookmark