Cardinal Sean “Stuttering” Brady Of Armagh.
Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012I wonder whether last night’s (1st May 2012) BBC Northern Ireland television expose (to be repeated on BBC 2 tonight, 2nd May 2012) of all things clerically abusive in Ireland and directed in the main at Cardinal Sean Brady, the Catholic Church’s main man, could possibly be the forge out of which the last nail was hammered which will eventually fix down the lid of the coffin on this stuttering fart of a prelate.
My old mate from America, Tom Doyle was in it, jostling to be the first man in the queue at the forge. Tom is a Dominican priest who told the American bishops 26 years ago that what they were doing in covering up this abuse scandal was wrong. They ignored him and side-lined this once ambitious and learned man and eventually stopped paying him and cancelled his pension. Tom, a high ranking Canon Lawyer, now travels the world giving expert testimony in courts and on the media pointing out in a very clear and precise way the damage these blundering priests are doing to their religion and flock.
Brady whilst admitting his presence in the Father Smythe case that rocked Ireland nearly 20 years ago, but only in the face of overwhelming evidence, has said he was only at the original enquiry in 1975 as a priest notary and it was not his position to publicise his knowledge. He did not even report his findings to the parents of Smythe’s abused children and he went on abusing for another 15 or so years, whilst Brady lived in Rome, burnishing his canonical reputation. His position was clear he said, he had to report to his superior, the bishop, and that was that as far as he was concerned. Pontius Pilatus comes to mind.
However it is not enough to say he did his duty. As a priest and a man of God he should surely have allowed his own private person to take an interest. Brady , at that time was a 36 year old canon lawyer and teacher, he was no slip of a lad fresh out of seminary. He was a mature Catholic priest with, you would hope, a conscience. He could surely see a wrong but did nothing to counteract it other than report it to his superior. A little like the Nazi philosophy to its followers, it was to this level that the Church had fallen.
So to act as a good centre half in the face of this unfair criticism of Brady, the Vatican wheels out Monsignor Charles Scicluna, the Promoter of Justice of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The CDF is the Vatican’s latter-day Inquisition and was headed for many years by the present pope, Benny 16 and is now presided over by the disgraced Californian, Cardinal William Levada. Scicluna said at the time when the first evidence was introduced two years ago ” I think he (Brady) fulfilled his duty well”. He has not learnt and he repeated his mantra again this morning.
Then onto the Pat Kenny programme on RTE 1 came Bishop Gerry Clifford, the mumbling Auxiliary Bishop of Armagh, a Scicluna think alike, who said that 1975, when Brady was implicated, “was in a different era, with a different ethos” and so the the turgid rubbish keeps spewing from these advanced cleric’s lips. Will they never ever learn. He said the damage to the victims was not realised in those days and it was not treated seriously. What shite, the Church knew about its long lasting damage at least in the 4th century at the Synod of Elvira in Spain where the first recorded response to clerical abuse was discussed and legislated against and also in the proceeding 17 centuries following that, where they have tried and failed to grip the problem and failed because of the transient bishops need to retain power. Brady will not resign, although age and confidence have deserted him. The only thing keeping him in place is his own need for power, defending the indefensible is his ethos.
Bishop Clifford’s only answer to his circumlocutor Kenny, who really lost his chance to hammer the man because he got lost in his own verbosity, was to say that if the same thing happened today it would be Brady’s or a modern day priest’s responsibility to go to the local Safeguarding Commission and report it there, if his bishop played a deaf one. The local Safeguarding Commission would take up the cudgel on the priest’s behalf and stop the rot.
To this statement I have a real problem. I have had experience of a Safeguarding Commission albeit in England and I doubt it is any different in whatever diocese you go to, they are all trained in the same response. My experience was in the Salford Diocese, a bunch of dudes I have written about at length, managed and run by priests with a sprinkling of lawyers looking for Vatican recognition and a heap of professionals in the field of Child Safety, who are only looking for additions to their curriculum vitae and could not give two damns about abused children and vulnerable adults.
In my case the fumbling idiot of a priest I reported to agreed with my accusations saying he had heard of the abuser for the whole of his twenty five years as a priest. Wherever these holy men got together on retreat or at the golf course, they whispered and tittered about the goings on of my man but did nothing about it. This fool said that their files were clean yet the whole bloody diocese knew of the satanic deeds of this monsignorial monster. This just sums up the corporative philosophy of the Church and in the years to come when the filth that is the Catholic Church is finally exposed, it will be this philosophy that drained the life out of the Vatican and made millions just like me, who had devoted their lives to its teaching, receive the bravura to walk away to their own personal, mental and philosophical peace.
If you wish to read more on this subject google “Clerical Whispers, 2nd May 2012″ and try and watch BBC2 repeat tonight Wednesday 2nd April 2012.